Did Tanmoy Bhattacharya Insult Prophet Muhammad? Furfura Pressure on CPIM, Party Denies Responsibility

Did Tanmoy Bhattacharya Insult Prophet Muhammad? Furfura Pressure on CPIM, Party Denies Responsibility

Tanmoy Bhattacharya’s Remarks on Islam Ignite Political Controversy: Suspended CPM leader and former MLA Tanmoy Bhattacharya has found himself at the center of yet another controversy. After being suspended from the party for allegedly harassing a female journalist, his recent comments on Islam have triggered a political storm. Bhattacharya’s remarks about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Islamic scriptures have invited strong reactions from ISF MLA and Furfura Sharif cleric Naushad Siddiqui. The demand for the CPM’s official stance on the issue is mounting, putting the party in an uncomfortable position.

Furfura Sharif’s Pressure on CPIM: Taking to social media, Naushad Siddiqui expressed his strong disapproval of Bhattacharya’s statements. He wrote, “The recently suspended CPM leader, former MLA Tanmoy Bhattacharya, has made unacceptable remarks about Islam. In an interview, I heard him disrespecting the greatest humanitarian, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). He has also commented on the Quran and Hadith in an inappropriate manner. Such statements are unacceptable, and I demand an immediate retraction.”

Additionally, Siddiqui questioned the CPM’s stance on the matter, saying, “What is CPM’s position on this issue?” This statement is seen as an attempt to put pressure on the party leadership at Alimuddin Street, the headquarters of CPM in West Bengal.

Read More :  Dengue Outbreak in West Bengal: Rising Death Toll Raises Concern in Kolkata and Surrounding Districts

Tanmoy Bhattacharya’s Response: Reacting to Naushad Siddiqui’s criticism, Bhattacharya stated that he had sent a written message to Siddiqui, seeking clarification on what exactly he had said wrong. He said, “If he can point out my mistake, I will correct it.” However, Naushad Siddiqui later claimed that he had not received any such message from Bhattacharya.

Defending his remarks, Bhattacharya explained, “I had simply stated that Prophet Muhammad was not deeply religious in his early life. During his journey from Mecca to Medina, he observed misgovernance and later established his rule based on his vision. I did not intend to disrespect anyone. I also pointed out that Islam, as a religion, is relatively new compared to others. My statements were purely historical.”

CPIM’s Unease and Political Fallout: The controversy has put the CPM in a difficult position. While senior leaders of the party have largely avoided making direct comments, West Bengal CPM Secretary Mohammad Salim subtly indicated the party’s displeasure with Bhattacharya’s actions. “Whatever he said was his personal opinion. This is not the CPM’s concern,” Salim stated.

Read More :  Junior Doctors in West Bengal Announce Strike After 8-Hour GB Meeting

This response makes it clear that the party is distancing itself from Bhattacharya’s statements and does not want to take responsibility for the controversy.

Religious Controversies Within the CPIM: This is not the first time that CPM leaders have sparked controversy over religious issues. During the Left Front government’s tenure, former minister Subhas Chakraborty had visited the Tarapith temple and offered prayers. His statement, “I am a Hindu Brahmin first and a communist later,” had created significant uproar within the party.

Similarly, another senior leader, Rezzak Mollah, after returning from Hajj, had declared, “Muhammad is greater than Marx.” While these past remarks had praised religion, Bhattacharya’s statements have been accused of hurting religious sentiments. Unlike the previous instances, the CPM has refused to take responsibility for Bhattacharya’s comments, making the situation more sensitive.

Read More :  Will Partha Chatterjee Secure Bail After Kesto? High Court to Deliver Verdict on Wednesday

Why This Controversy Matters? Bhattacharya’s remarks have ignited a new debate about the intersection of religion and politics in West Bengal. With the CPM trying to regain lost ground, particularly among Muslim voters, this controversy comes at a challenging time. Political analysts suggest that this issue could have electoral ramifications, as the ISF, led by Naushad Siddiqui, continues to gain influence.

The coming days will determine how the CPIM handles this controversy and whether it can contain the damage. The question remains—will Tanmoy Bhattacharya retract his statement, or will the party take further action against him?

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*