Autopsy Doctor and Sandeep’s Collaboration Exposed, CBI Achieves Major Breakthrough in RG Kar Case

In the high-profile murder and rape case of a medical student from RG Kar Medical College, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has raised serious concerns regarding the accuracy and completeness of both the inquest and autopsy reports. According to CBI sources, the inquest report was prepared in just 20 minutes, and the autopsy report took only 1 hour and 10 minutes, which they claim is suspiciously rushed given the gravity of the case. Both reports are considered crucial court-admissible evidence in murder and rape investigations, and any discrepancies in these documents could severely affect the case.

An inquest report is generally prepared by a judicial magistrate after examining the deceased’s body in detail, and it serves as the basis for the subsequent autopsy. Usually, this process takes about an hour, but in this case, it was completed in only 20 minutes, raising doubts among investigators. CBI sources suggest that the report prepared by the judicial magistrate between 4:20 p.m. and 4:40 p.m. appears to have been based on a cursory glance at the body, without thoroughly examining it.

According to CBI officials, the body wasn’t even turned over for proper inspection, which is a basic requirement in such cases. They claim that the magistrate’s report does not include specific details of the injuries on the deceased’s body, such as their precise location and nature. For instance, the report states there were multiple injuries on the left leg but does not clarify whether the injuries were on the foot, knee, or ankle. Similarly, injuries on the face are vaguely mentioned without specifying their exact location.

There was also evidence of internal bleeding in the eyes and mouth, but the cause of these injuries wasn’t documented. Furthermore, there is no mention of whether the back of the head or the posterior side of the body was examined for any injuries. CBI investigators also point out that the report does not provide detailed information about injuries on the abdomen, nor does it explain the presence of blood in the genital area.

A broken hair clip was reportedly found near the victim’s genitals, but the report does not clarify its proximity to the body, leading investigators to question the thoroughness of the inquest. Additionally, the report is vague about the condition of the victim’s clothing at the time of examination. Although two doctors were present as witnesses during the preparation of the inquest report, their statements are missing from the document.

A senior CBI officer expressed frustration, stating, “In my 26 years of service, I have never seen such a carelessly prepared inquest report. It is deeply concerning.” Investigators believe that a detailed report on the injuries could have provided crucial insights into how the crime was committed, potentially indicating whether one or more individuals were involved. However, the gaps in the report make it difficult to draw any conclusions.

The CBI has summoned the judicial magistrate multiple times for questioning regarding the rapid preparation of the inquest report. There are several inconsistencies that have raised red flags for the investigation team, and these issues will be presented to the Supreme Court in a sealed report during the hearing of the case.

Investigators also suspect that there may have been an attempt to tamper with or destroy evidence systematically, given the inconsistencies in the reports. The CBI claims that the incomplete details in the inquest report and the rushed autopsy, conducted after sunset, have now become significant hurdles in solving the case. This lack of thoroughness in the crucial initial investigation phase has potentially compromised the process, further complicating an already complex case.

As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen how these gaps in the inquest and autopsy reports will impact the case. The CBI’s findings highlight the need for meticulous handling of evidence, especially in sensitive and high-profile cases like this, where every detail could be crucial in uncovering the truth.